<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaloogian Fires Back in Photo Flap</title>
	<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/</link>
	<description>The dirt on San Diego politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: San Diego Blog</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-1468</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:38:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-1468</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;San Diego Politics Blog on Kaloogian Photo Hubbub&lt;/strong&gt;

The whole Kaloogian thing has been big news, though we have managed to avoid it. To get your hands dirty, check out the San Diego Politics Blog:
(and for the lighter side, web 2.0 silly-style, check out denounce today!)
San Diego Politics Blog :: Kaloo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>San Diego Politics Blog on Kaloogian Photo Hubbub</strong></p>
	<p>The whole Kaloogian thing has been big news, though we have managed to avoid it. To get your hands dirty, check out the San Diego Politics Blog:<br />
(and for the lighter side, web 2.0 silly-style, check out denounce today!)<br />
San Diego Politics Blog :: Kaloo&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: defender</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-495</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:58:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-495</guid>
					<description>LAL, I looked for something using your link and didn't finad anything either.

If you aren't a Con you sure sound like one.  It has become a really tiring (and now totally transparent) feature of GOP followers to throw out allegetions without a shread of evidence and expect others to prove you wrong.  That is decietful and disingenous. And it is starting to backfire today because thinking Americans are aware of the trick.   
The &quot;swiftboating&quot; of America is over.  We've had 15 years of allegations like &quot;have you stopped cheating on your wife?&quot; which is a trick question.  Stop jerking our chains, or at least come up with a more entertaining way to do it.  Meritless allogations are getting old and boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LAL, I looked for something using your link and didn&#8217;t finad anything either.</p>
	<p>If you aren&#8217;t a Con you sure sound like one.  It has become a really tiring (and now totally transparent) feature of GOP followers to throw out allegetions without a shread of evidence and expect others to prove you wrong.  That is decietful and disingenous. And it is starting to backfire today because thinking Americans are aware of the trick.<br />
The &#8220;swiftboating&#8221; of America is over.  We&#8217;ve had 15 years of allegations like &#8220;have you stopped cheating on your wife?&#8221; which is a trick question.  Stop jerking our chains, or at least come up with a more entertaining way to do it.  Meritless allogations are getting old and boring.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nik</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-485</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:25:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-485</guid>
					<description>LAL:  It would be awesome if your link actually worked.

I spent quite some time looking for any descriptive article or summary of the complaint against Busby, and couldn't find anything more than a sentence or two long.

That's why I asked you to provide a real link.


Go away, you bother me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LAL:  It would be awesome if your link actually worked.</p>
	<p>I spent quite some time looking for any descriptive article or summary of the complaint against Busby, and couldn&#8217;t find anything more than a sentence or two long.</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s why I asked you to provide a real link.</p>
	<p>Go away, you bother me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Court Jester</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-447</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:03:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-447</guid>
					<description>LAL: Don't include me in your &quot;us&quot;.  I don't know who you are.  You are very comfortable repeating verbatim talking points lifted from Howards site, while attacking others who dare to ask you to back up accusations with some facts.

The only real question, I guess, is whether you are a GOP troll trying to attack the Dem frontrunner; or someone who supports another Dem candidate and is willing to defend the GOP in order to attack the Dem frontrunner.

Your link was garbage.  If your claims have any merit, it should be easy to point to something substantive.  Apparently there has been a complaint against Busby filed by the GOP.  It shows that they're taking her campaign seriously, as they should.  It's an *allegation* at this point. Remember that whole &quot;innocent until proven guilty&quot; thing? The FEC gets to decide if the law was broken, not you, not the GOP. (Assuming there's a difference)

Shouldn't a real Dem be pointing out the merits of the candidate they *do* support rather than sniping at other Dem candidates?  Feel free to take the high road; or continue telling those that want facts liars and ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LAL: Don&#8217;t include me in your &#8220;us&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t know who you are.  You are very comfortable repeating verbatim talking points lifted from Howards site, while attacking others who dare to ask you to back up accusations with some facts.</p>
	<p>The only real question, I guess, is whether you are a GOP troll trying to attack the Dem frontrunner; or someone who supports another Dem candidate and is willing to defend the GOP in order to attack the Dem frontrunner.</p>
	<p>Your link was garbage.  If your claims have any merit, it should be easy to point to something substantive.  Apparently there has been a complaint against Busby filed by the GOP.  It shows that they&#8217;re taking her campaign seriously, as they should.  It&#8217;s an *allegation* at this point. Remember that whole &#8220;innocent until proven guilty&#8221; thing? The FEC gets to decide if the law was broken, not you, not the GOP. (Assuming there&#8217;s a difference)</p>
	<p>Shouldn&#8217;t a real Dem be pointing out the merits of the candidate they *do* support rather than sniping at other Dem candidates?  Feel free to take the high road; or continue telling those that want facts liars and ignorant.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Court Jester</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-442</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 16:36:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-442</guid>
					<description>LAL:  Yes, I'm a blogger, and I assumed you were.  I simply asked for a link to back up a pecific claim (&quot;breaking a law&quot;).  That's SOP for bloggers isn't it.  I abhor blind obediance in a party.  And I abhor the Lieberman approach as well.  I wasn't aware of the *allegations* against Busby, and since you were saying she broke the law, I hoped for a link to it to educate myself.  but *you* made the claim, the onus is on *you* to provide support.  Your snark does not seem justified.  You have now given me a link, so I'll follow it and educate myself.   And when it comes right down to it, unless you are willing to believe everything Howard claims, Busby people weren't involved in the discovery of the fake picture; nor did they bring it forward.  You act more like GOP than Dem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>LAL:  Yes, I&#8217;m a blogger, and I assumed you were.  I simply asked for a link to back up a pecific claim (&#8221;breaking a law&#8221;).  That&#8217;s SOP for bloggers isn&#8217;t it.  I abhor blind obediance in a party.  And I abhor the Lieberman approach as well.  I wasn&#8217;t aware of the *allegations* against Busby, and since you were saying she broke the law, I hoped for a link to it to educate myself.  but *you* made the claim, the onus is on *you* to provide support.  Your snark does not seem justified.  You have now given me a link, so I&#8217;ll follow it and educate myself.   And when it comes right down to it, unless you are willing to believe everything Howard claims, Busby people weren&#8217;t involved in the discovery of the fake picture; nor did they bring it forward.  You act more like GOP than Dem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Liberal Against Lying</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-433</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 04:26:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-433</guid>
					<description>Just so that you have no more excuses for ignorance, here is an OBVIOUS place to start.    

http://www.google.com/u/csusm?q=francine+busby

But your a blogger, so you knew that...and more. Lies don't become us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just so that you have no more excuses for ignorance, here is an OBVIOUS place to start.    </p>
	<p><a >http://www.google.com/u/csusm?q=francine+busby</a></p>
	<p>But your a blogger, so you knew that&#8230;and more. Lies don&#8217;t become us.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Liberal Against Lying</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-432</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 04:22:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-432</guid>
					<description>I have seen the actual complaint filed against Busby.  It isn't going to go away.  And if you can't find the web links, it is because 2 hours after the allegations were made- the web pages were shut down.  Now how is it that she has &quot;no control over the content&quot; yet it was pulled off the web so quickly?  I am not going to do your homework for you.  If you wanna see it you just need to open your eyes and look. You just don't WANT to find it. Typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have seen the actual complaint filed against Busby.  It isn&#8217;t going to go away.  And if you can&#8217;t find the web links, it is because 2 hours after the allegations were made- the web pages were shut down.  Now how is it that she has &#8220;no control over the content&#8221; yet it was pulled off the web so quickly?  I am not going to do your homework for you.  If you wanna see it you just need to open your eyes and look. You just don&#8217;t WANT to find it. Typical.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andra</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-374</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:18:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-374</guid>
					<description>If the wrong photo was &quot;accidentally&quot; uploaded, where is the CORRECT photo that should have posted on his site???? If no photo exists, then clearly he is LYING!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If the wrong photo was &#8220;accidentally&#8221; uploaded, where is the CORRECT photo that should have posted on his site???? If no photo exists, then clearly he is LYING!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nik</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-373</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:12:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-373</guid>
					<description>Possibly, but it doesn't really matter.

I'd like Liberal Against Lying to find me an article, press release, anything anywhere showing me screenshots of the &quot;illegal campaign web page&quot; or describing (using more than a single sentence) what Busby &quot;did&quot; and how it's illegal.

This was a big to-do for about a day, and disappeared.  Probably for good reason.

It's not uncommon for professors or special guest speakers at a university forum to have a biography posted to the university web page.  Busby is running for congress, it doesn't take a huge stretch of the imagination to understand why her bio would include a link to her campaign website.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Possibly, but it doesn&#8217;t really matter.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;d like Liberal Against Lying to find me an article, press release, anything anywhere showing me screenshots of the &#8220;illegal campaign web page&#8221; or describing (using more than a single sentence) what Busby &#8220;did&#8221; and how it&#8217;s illegal.</p>
	<p>This was a big to-do for about a day, and disappeared.  Probably for good reason.</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s not uncommon for professors or special guest speakers at a university forum to have a biography posted to the university web page.  Busby is running for congress, it doesn&#8217;t take a huge stretch of the imagination to understand why her bio would include a link to her campaign website.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cross Tabs</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-372</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:46:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/03/30/kaloogian-fires-back-in-photo-flap/#comment-372</guid>
					<description>I think liberal against lying and Wendy are the same person. Anyone with me on that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think liberal against lying and Wendy are the same person. Anyone with me on that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
