<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fleischman tough on Bilbray</title>
	<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/</link>
	<description>The dirt on San Diego politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: yup it's me</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-747</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:26:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-747</guid>
					<description>Bilbray is more of a Goldwater conservative than a socialist liberal.  He is one to support less government rather than the &quot;Big Government&quot; conservative that Cunningham, Delay, and Bush have brought us. But I am sure some of you will try to rationalize Bush's efforts to build up the federal government.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bilbray is more of a Goldwater conservative than a socialist liberal.  He is one to support less government rather than the &#8220;Big Government&#8221; conservative that Cunningham, Delay, and Bush have brought us. But I am sure some of you will try to rationalize Bush&#8217;s efforts to build up the federal government.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: billyb</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-739</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 06:12:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-739</guid>
					<description>IF FEAR OF THE LIBERAL MACHINE IS THE MOTIVE THEN BILBRAY IS THE CLEAR CHOICE  BECAUSE HE SUCKS THE  LIBERAL WAR CHEST DRY EVERY TIME HE RUNS ---
THE PRO CHOICE AND  PRO GAY PAC'S SPENT MORE TO DEFEAT BILBRAY IN 1996-..1998 AND 2000 THAN IN ANY CONGRESSIONAL RACE IN HISTORY---AND THAT IS NOT AN OVERSTATEMENT -ITS FACT.--

THE SILENCE OF UNREBUTTED ATTACKS UPON BILBRAYS REPUBLICAN CREDENTIALS BY THE LOCAL GOP HAS GIVEN THEM CREDIABILITY ---IT BE A INDICATION OF LOCAL LEADERSHIPS'  STATEWIDE AMBITIONS.. THAT REQUIRE  SUPPORT FROM THE FAR-CHRISTIAN RIGHT.-----THIS IS ALL THAT CAN EXPLAIN THE PAUCITY OF ANY REAL LEADERSHIP IN THIS RACE,

THE OBVIOUS CHOICE BECOMES LESS OBVIOUS AS TIME GOES BY---BILBRAY WAS SO OBVIOUS UP FRONT THAT THE SLIGHTEST LEADERSHIP AT THAT TIME,  WOULD HAVE KEPT THE NUMBER OF CANDIDATES  AT LEAST DOWN TO THE SIZE OF A LIBERTARIAN CONVENTION---BUT OF COURSE THE CONSULTING INDUSTRY WOULD HAVE HAD A FIT SEEING THE LOSS OF ALL THOSE MILLIONS --HUH??--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>IF FEAR OF THE LIBERAL MACHINE IS THE MOTIVE THEN BILBRAY IS THE CLEAR CHOICE  BECAUSE HE SUCKS THE  LIBERAL WAR CHEST DRY EVERY TIME HE RUNS &#8212;<br />
THE PRO CHOICE AND  PRO GAY PAC&#8217;S SPENT MORE TO DEFEAT BILBRAY IN 1996-..1998 AND 2000 THAN IN ANY CONGRESSIONAL RACE IN HISTORY&#8212;AND THAT IS NOT AN OVERSTATEMENT -ITS FACT.&#8211;</p>
	<p>THE SILENCE OF UNREBUTTED ATTACKS UPON BILBRAYS REPUBLICAN CREDENTIALS BY THE LOCAL GOP HAS GIVEN THEM CREDIABILITY &#8212;IT BE A INDICATION OF LOCAL LEADERSHIPS&#8217;  STATEWIDE AMBITIONS.. THAT REQUIRE  SUPPORT FROM THE FAR-CHRISTIAN RIGHT.&#8212;&#8211;THIS IS ALL THAT CAN EXPLAIN THE PAUCITY OF ANY REAL LEADERSHIP IN THIS RACE,</p>
	<p>THE OBVIOUS CHOICE BECOMES LESS OBVIOUS AS TIME GOES BY&#8212;BILBRAY WAS SO OBVIOUS UP FRONT THAT THE SLIGHTEST LEADERSHIP AT THAT TIME,  WOULD HAVE KEPT THE NUMBER OF CANDIDATES  AT LEAST DOWN TO THE SIZE OF A LIBERTARIAN CONVENTION&#8212;BUT OF COURSE THE CONSULTING INDUSTRY WOULD HAVE HAD A FIT SEEING THE LOSS OF ALL THOSE MILLIONS &#8211;HUH??&#8211;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bilbray is Liberal on social issues</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-733</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:13:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-733</guid>
					<description>Bilbray is liberal on abortion and gay adoption and in fact was one of only 3 Republicans in the house to side with the democrats on the gay adoption issue--and it passed because of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bilbray is liberal on abortion and gay adoption and in fact was one of only 3 Republicans in the house to side with the democrats on the gay adoption issue&#8211;and it passed because of him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yup it's me</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-728</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:18:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-728</guid>
					<description>Give me a break Bilbray is not a liberal.  When you check people's voting records (V.E.Roach wouldn't be too familiar with what that is) you will see the most &quot;liberal&quot; Republican is no where near the most &quot;conservative&quot; Democrat.  Lets keep it real.  Brian is the only candidate that can truly represent the ENTIRE district not just a small special interest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Give me a break Bilbray is not a liberal.  When you check people&#8217;s voting records (V.E.Roach wouldn&#8217;t be too familiar with what that is) you will see the most &#8220;liberal&#8221; Republican is no where near the most &#8220;conservative&#8221; Democrat.  Lets keep it real.  Brian is the only candidate that can truly represent the ENTIRE district not just a small special interest.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cross Tabs</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-725</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:01:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-725</guid>
					<description>Or herself! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Or herself!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Drained</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-723</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:58:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-723</guid>
					<description>Make check out to ?

I'm wondering if SDpolitics will reveal himself after the elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Make check out to ?</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m wondering if SDpolitics will reveal himself after the elections.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Barry Jantz</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-698</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:34:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-698</guid>
					<description>I was just wondering if SDPolitics gets a check every time it mentions the FlashReport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was just wondering if SDPolitics gets a check every time it mentions the FlashReport.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-691</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:50:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sdpolitics.blogsome.com/2006/04/10/fleischman-tough-on-bilbray/#comment-691</guid>
					<description>This has become a two-man race on the Republican side and it should not surprise anyone that one is a conservative and the other is a liberal!

As usual, the voters will figure this one out just in time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This has become a two-man race on the Republican side and it should not surprise anyone that one is a conservative and the other is a liberal!</p>
	<p>As usual, the voters will figure this one out just in time!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
